GED Science: Correlation versus Causation
Remember that science can serve many purposes, such as description, classification, explanation, and prediction. However, when many people are asked to describe the purpose of science, they will say to explain why something happens, or to establish cause and effect. Indeed, one of the most powerful aspects of science is in its ability to establish causal, or cause and effect, relationships.
However, one public misconception about science is that all scientific explanations establish causation. Even when science can predict something, it does not mean that the causal relationship has been established. Consider the following popular example of the difference between causation and correlation:
There is a well-established relationship between the consumption of ice cream (let’s say, measured in number of ice cream cones eaten), and the number of deaths by drowning. One can predict the number of drowning deaths from the number of ice creams consumed. However, ice cream consumption is not the cause of the drowning deaths (any more than the drowning deaths cause an increase in the amount of ice cream consumption). While ice cream consumption and drowning are correlated, the warm temperatures of summer are what lead to both increased ice cream consumption and the increased rate of deaths by drowning. Consider the following diagram:
When a scientist says that there is a relationship between two things, it does not necessarily follow that they are saying that one thing causes another. This is a misconception that many people have when reading the results of scientific studies or listening to scientific findings in the media.